Skip to main content

3d Guns....thoughts

The blueprint used to produce a 3D-printed plastic gun has been downloaded about 100,000 times since going online earlier this week, according to Forbes.
Most downloads were in the US, followed by Spain, Brazil, Germany and the UK. - bbc

I suppose the powers-that-be allowed this to go through so as to maintain the global element of fear. Best to fear your neighbour so that you wouldn't bother to keep your eyes on the government i suppose.


If they came up with a 3d design for a nuclear weapon, you can be sure that the elite will do something about it as it can threaten their well-being directly.  However, with a 3d Gun, that only causes the people to fear each other.


Oh boy. Now we need physical searches of all baggage in the airport. 


People can always do something about governments without guns - as Gandhi had already proved - if they act together.  But failing to want to act together indicates the preponderance of mutual alienation. 

In such a case, If they still insist that they need guns to 'protect themselves from the government', as some claim, then that means they are already fragmented enough to not be able to act together without arms to deal with the government.  In such a case, how can they trust each other with a gun when they are mutually alienated in the first place?

In a situation where mutual alienation is true, and governments are oppressive, what can be expected is that people would be more likely to use their guns on each other to protect themselves from the consequences and rising cost of their apathy toward a self-serving government.



Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…