Skip to main content

Nothing to 'Rejoice!' over Thatcher's Death





I received an email from SW (Socialist Worker Britain) with the heading 'Rejoice....that Thatcher is dead' - i was a former member of the Socialist Party UK, and later, the Socialist Worker's Party UK for a while.

I'm a Socialist myself, but i don't understand the need to 'rejoice'.

It's not like she's the one inflicting cuts all over the place at present in the UK is she. Yes, she set certain things in motion that are most certainly deplorable, but for the ball to keep rolling from her time to the present requires it to be given its continuing momentum by those that came after her, along with the impotent strategies of the Socialist in the UK in effecting change. (i'm not advocating violence here).

The Newtonian Principle of Inertia (where an object in motion continues along its path with equal force) does not apply in this case as the evils in British society has been given its impetus not solely by her, but all whom came after her as well.

Hence, her death, or rejoicing in its face, serves no purpose whatsoever. It may serve as a catharsis, but the problem still remains. Claiming victory over her death does not translate to being victorious over life.

(the article by SW is still quite enlightening and worth the read)


ed




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…