Skip to main content

Saving Brit Pubs with Coffee and E-cigs

Thousands of publicans are struggling to make a living, with the smoking ban, high beer tax and "unfair" prices charged by pub companies being blamed. The government has promised to act, but will it do enough?
- bbc: can politicians save british pubs?

I think the traditional British pub would do well in becoming more inclusive of new traditions.

For instance, it could draw in coffee-drinkers from the coffee-chains as well.  Given that pubs enjoy longer opening hours, this might work in its favour.  However, cup-design is important in this respect.  Those fat mugs of coffee sold by coffee-outlets do not make it easy for a person to mingle around or go on a friendly walkabout in a pub for fear of scalding one’s hand or staining the carpet.  Tall heatproof cups, or takeaway-style cups might do the trick.  The point is to enable the coffee-drinker to be as mobile about the pub as are pint-holders.  That is a part of the British pub culture isn’t it.  It’s not just about the booze, but the ease with which one might saunter from table to table, or fruit machine to pool table.

Secondly, to get around the ‘smoking ban’ in pubs, and do their bit to discourage smoking as well, pubs could welcome ‘e-cigarette smokers’, or ‘vapers’ as they call themselves.  And they wouldn’t need to invest in smoke-extractors either, and yet be able to avail themselves of air-fresheners that ‘e-cigs’ double as.

I personally like going to pubs, but do not like to drink much, and do not like to be confined to a table because of the design of my cup of coffee which is more suited to be appreciated whilst seated.  The coffee-machine at my local pub is also situated away from the bar as if it is an alien part of the pub.  Aesthetically, or decor-wise, it is already exclusive. 

One needs to be able to associate the pub with coffee or tea as well as a pint or a half, instead of alliteratively associating the pub with a pint. ~ ed  

One could even say that pubs not being inclusive in this respect is dividing the nation between the pint-holders and coffee-drinkers and reducing its support base.  Not many are going to bother moving from a coffee-outlet when it closes at 6 or so, on to a pub for more coffee.  Hence, to present the pub as a coffee-outlet as well is to give coffee-drinkers, or teetotallers a reason to bypass coffee-outlets.  I personally wouldn't mind half a pint of coffee topped with ice and a brolly.



  1. Brilliant ideas on the e-cig and coffee mug :) I share the same feelings when I am in the UK. Meetings with friends over coffee always have to end by 6pm that's when cafes usually close for the day. Most of us couldn't be bothered to move to a pub. If Brit pubs start to implement your ideas, that will certainly be very well received by most of the people I know.

  2.  Thanks :)  We need more people about like those you know. 

  3. Some really nice points to think about, pub owners can definitely keep their business alive by following the above mentioned guidelines.

  4. These ideas are good but i don't think a lot of people like going to pubs even for coffee, allowing electronic cigarettes can be very beneficial.


Post a Comment

The Inquisitive venture is a collaborative one. Let's collaborate.

Ad hominem is fine so long as it is accompanied with an argument, as opposed to being confused for an argument. In the latter case, deletion will follow.

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…