Skip to main content

NZ workers’ unionisation of McDonald’s an ‘Achievement’?

A small, spunky union in New Zealand has become one of the most successful fast food organizing efforts in the world, with more than 4,000 members at KFC, Pizza Hut, McDonald’s, Starbucks, Burger King, and Wendy’s.
- labornotes: how workers super-sized their pay in nz

I first 'Liked' the above, and then, on second thoughts.....

Achieving worker's rights within a culturally hegemonic organisation that sells rubbish food distracts one from the reality of the it obviously has in this case amongst (bourgeois) socialists.

I'm waiting for the time when workers get together and SHUT DOWN McDonalds. Now THAT would be an achievement.

As for the above 'achievement', that's like unionising Al Qaeda or the CIA. How nice. The virtue is not in the act of unionising, but what hell you are unionising. McDonald's magnanimity in this case serves as another effort on their part in sanitizing and sanctifying their image.

Alright, i'm going to 'Unlike' this now...



  1. LOL...shut down Mcdonalds and have us pay 8 dollars for a decent cup of coffee? Maybe we should also close down those shops and cafes that are jumping on the organic bandwagon...exploiting people's quest for a healthier lifestyle by rendering healthy eating an elitist affair is just appalling.

  2. The point is not to close them down, but to take them over.  But i didn't make that point above because to make McDonald's food healthy would simply mean it ceases to be the McDonald's we are accustomed to.  And i don't know how closing McDonald's down means a decent cup of coffee is going to cost 8 dollars.

  3. The 8 dollars comment was not mean to be taken literally. It simply meant that we are presented with the option of either opting for "rubbish food" at a cheaper price or for organic food at staggeringly high prices.
    Either way, you're damned and like I said, healthy living has been turned into an elitist affair. Nvm...


Post a Comment

The Inquisitive venture is a collaborative one. Let's collaborate.

Ad hominem is fine so long as it is accompanied with an argument, as opposed to being confused for an argument. In the latter case, deletion will follow.

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…