Skip to main content

The Oscars is for Losers




The Oscars serving as a 'welcome distraction' from the global economic mess?  I’ve heard quite a few people of voting-age making this comment online. 

Well, If it wasn't for society worshiping and paying these celebs/royalty/elite/pop-stars as much as it does, we wouldn't be in this economic mess, we would have found a cure for HIV, and thousands of children won't be dying daily from starvation, poverty, contaminated water, and disease.  People are just reinforcing the foundations from whence arise consequences they bemoan.   

People talk about the entertainment industry making their economy (i.e. The U.S. and to a far lesser degree, the U.K.) lots of money, but forget that this singular ‘economy’ they speak of is actually divisible by class.  It is the industrial elite/royalty/celebs/actors/pop-stars whose ‘economy’ is being enriched.  You just get pennies in exchange for their pounds mate.   Religion is certainly the opiate of the masses, especially where it specifically extolls the virtue of  privilege over the thus-created peasantry.  In that sense, whoever wins at the Oscars, you still lose.


People should really learn to connect the dots. All the fanboys/girls can give this the thumbs-down now.

It takes a great deal of self-disrespect to worship the 'stars' and be a 'fan'.  I'd rather Gods whom teach us self-respect for our potentials than those that misdirect or make less of them.

(part of the above was placed as a comment beneath the relevant bbc article)


ed



Comments

  1. Yeah!
    Let's all worship the bollywood gods and goddesses.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Don't know what you're defensive about mate. The same logic applies to 'Bollywood'. But then again, your calling it 'Bollywood' after 'Hollywood' says much in itself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. All the hypes over Oscars and obsession with celebrities when there are people who have no clothes and go hungry everyday. Something is seriously wrong with the common people today. Placing the stars on pedestal and worshipping them blindly, yet complaining about the economic, social and political mess around them. Have they taken a minute to consider how many cures could be found and how many starving mouths could be fed with the monies spent on the ceremony by the organisers and the participants?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

The Inquisitive venture is a collaborative one. Let's collaborate.

Ad hominem is fine so long as it is accompanied with an argument, as opposed to being confused for an argument. In the latter case, deletion will follow.

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…