Skip to main content

Thoughts on the Newtown Shootings

I suppose keeping guns legal in the U.S. enables the people to fear each other enough to not take down the system that thrives on mutual antagonism, exploitation, and other modern forms of historical rape, pillage, and plunder.

That said, i'm speechless in the face of this i am in the face of the close-to-half-a-million children who died in Iraq due to U.S. embargoes.


Two people attempting to subdue the assailant in this tragedy if he was armed only with a knife would stand a better chance of not being shot when they are yet to approach him, and hence, would probably have before much, if any, damage is done.

Yup.  People kill, not guns, but i wouldn't want to make it convenient or expeditious for potential killers by legalising guns. 


America commits violence against others and their own; they promote violent computer games; gore and violent movies; promote mutual antagonism and competition by championing capitalism......

oh, and within this context, they legalise the ownership of guns. Just another means to articulate whatever tendencies are reinforced by all of the above. Tragic.


(above placed as comments beneath the above-pictured article.)


Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…