Skip to main content

product review: XLC Bahamas spectacles


Mine just arrived this morning.   I must say that i've seen similar quality frames for sale for hundreds of pounds.

(following posted as review on amazon.co.uk)

It can be worn with the outer 'sunglass' lenses with or without the optical inserts behind it, or, without the outer 'sunglass' lenses with the optical inserts alone - you can get coloured lenses for your optical inserts so that it would serve as sunglasses itself without the outer sunglass lenses. That way, you can remove the outer curved lenses and just wear the frame with the optical inserts thus providing a quite unique design for which you might have to pay hundreds at your local spectacles store.

My only quibble with the design - hence 4 instead of 5 stars - is that instead of black-rimmed optical inserts, XLC would have done better with a 'screw-on' optical-insert design that allows one to get rimless prescription lenses, and fasten it into a cylindrical-shaped obtrusions at the bridge behind the outer 'sunglass' lenses. Wonder why it didn't occur to them. Hmmm...perhaps i ought to patent that idea;)

Anyway, i would certainly recommend this frame for those whom think, like I do, that the spectacle industry is industriously ripping off people with high-priced frames that probably only cost a couple of pounds to produce.


ed



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…