Skip to main content

Is it right to backup your Dvds?

points to ponder....

With the introduction of digital media players like WDTV, it would be space-saving to store dvds without the dvds wouldn't it.

Backing up your Dvd enables you to truly ‘own’ your dvd even if the disk itself gets damaged in any way. If not, when we are told we can 'own' the dvd, it might only mean that we can lease it as long as the dvd lasts.

Backing up legally purchased Dvds helps us get around the life-span of the dvd. Or are profiteers simply hoping that we'd be forced to buy new sets when old sets get damaged?

Backing up Dvds would also make sense for those who travel frequently. Surely they can’t be expected to pack a couple of luggage of Dvds if they were going overseas? If that is not allowed, then can it be said that when you ‘own’ a Dvd, you only do so in the country of purchase and where you can watch it via the hardcopy, and not when you travel overseas and can only have your collection stored on a hard-drive?

What if you have backups of legally purchased Dvds, you go on a trip, come back to find your house burgled, and your Dvd collection gone. Are you allowed to keep your backup copies, or are you supposed to delete them in respect of the fact that the burglars are now the new owners of your Dvd collection even if they did not purchase them themselves?

If we are allowed to make copies of our CDs, shouldn’t this be applicable to Dvds?

Are purchasers of 2nd hand Dvds allowed to make backups of the Dvds?

What’s legal must be in accordance with what’s right. Not the other way round.The following are thoughts that occurred to myself whilst considering ‘for’ and ‘against’ arguments on the net.
If we aren’t allowed to keep backup copies of Dvds which we sell off as 2nd hand later, then should the purchase of 2nd hand Dvds be made illegal since they are getting it for, say, half price, and we are losing half the price in that sale. If the 2nd owners are able to make backup copies of their half-priced Dvds, than should we be able to do so as well since we’ve made a loss equivalent to the half priced purchase by 2nd hand buyers? Putting it simply. I may not be the current owner of my Dvds as i sold off a 10 quid dvd for 5 quid. The 2nd buyer pays 5 quid, and i’ve made a 5 quid loss. In other words, we’ve both finally paid 5 quid for the dvd in terms of my purchasing it for 10 quid, selling it off for 5 quid, and thus having invested 5 quid in it. If the 2nd current owner can make a backup, wouldn’t i have the right to keep my backup as i’ve invested the same amount in it as the 2nd owner?

What’s legal must be in accordance with what’s right. Not the other way round. That is what founded the current version of democracy and modernity. To demolish the path that led to a more progressive present is to mire humanity in a past made contemporary.



Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…