Skip to main content

Frenchies approve thongs but ban the Islamic veil

France is the first country in Europe to publicly ban a form of dress some Muslims regard as a religious duty.

Offenders face a fine of 150 euros (£133; $217) and a citizenship course. - bbc

Oh, the stupid French have done it again. Well, i’ve said quite a bit about it in the past when they first banned its use in universities (links below).

I really don't understand a people who'd prefer their mothers and sisters don the immodesty of whores instead of the modesty of women.
The same thing applies in the case of the Confucian state of singapore whose chinese racial supremacist government banned the Hijab in schools, citing the need for conformity and unity, but, on the other hand, celebrates and promotes chinese culture with campaigns and great pomp in society over all others. That basically extols conformity to 'chinese' culture, and renders the singaporean identity synonymous with the chinese one...and you won't find the chinese complaining about that, which makes them not too dissimilar to the french in their self-absorption - though it's not as bad amongst the French as i've witnessed some level of inter-cultural/national empathy amongst them.

To both, I would say, I don't give a toss about your 'values' if such 'values' lead to your devaluation of difference. If anything should be banned, it should be such cultural/racial supremacism.

As for the self-absorbed French, I really don't understand a people who'd prefer their mothers and sisters don the immodesty of whores instead of the modesty of women. I don't have a problem with either, so long as one is not legally countenanced over the other.

Vive la Difference! (2007)

Discussing the Hijab (2005)

To the Oh So Idiotic French (2005)

Red Hijab (2005)



Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…