Shove the 'royal' wedding

“Labour leader Ed Miliband has said he is "appalled" by the idea of trade unions planning strikes to disrupt royal wedding celebrations. He told the BBC such a plan of action would be "absolutely the wrong thing to do" and a "sign of failure"” - bbc

And this guy is ‘Labour’s’ leader?


I think this fella spells ‘Labour’ with a C-o-n-s-e-r-v-a-t-i-v-e. He’s maintaining the right of the unrightfully-privileged to lavishly laud their status over the people, and at a time of economic crisis even - 'economic crisis' means the rich not making as much as they are used to, and the rest not making enough whilst being used. Someone kick this guy out of 'labour' please. And he’s even named ‘ed’. Damn.

So people are losing jobs, suffering pay freezes, have to pay so much more for a bottle of chilli sauce purchased at Tesco’s, and we have to fork out for Will and Kate’s grand wedding?
That’s the problem with a nation which has turned privilege into an institution. I’ve often said that Elizabeth and her ‘royal’ family should be put on the council housing list and given a ticket to the job centre. I'm even willing to pay for their taxi rides to the centre. When we turn privilege into an institution and culture, we stand the risk of being treasonous when we question it. And via the maintenance of such ill-justified privilege - i.e. royal family in the UK, celebrities in the US - privilege garnered via other means - such as being an exploitative capitalist ba***** - doesn’t require much justification for it to be respected - ‘my great grandfather took the risk and started up a business and I now have the right to make millions out of the labour of others.’

If you didn’t get that point, i’ll put it another way. If i can maintain something as right without reason - like supporting the existence of the royal family simply because they are descendants of this or that powerful fella in the past - then i’m not going to have to make much effort in justifying a class system where i can say that this or that gal or guy have the right to exploit you because s/he takes the trouble to come in to work everyday and read the financial times and do the crossword.

So people are losing jobs, suffering pay freezes, have to pay so much more for a fish fillet purchased at Tesco’s, and we have to fork out for Will and Kate’s grand wedding? Is he going to fork out for yours? Or subsidise your purchase of a bag of potatoes? Nope.

So if the people are thinking of going on strike on this twit’s wedding day, they should again. Starvation and suffering doesn’t cease just because some privileged ponce is getting hitched, and especially if our subsidising his privileged existence and wedding is contributing to our suffering.


ed

0 thoughts:

The Inquisitive venture is a collaborative one. Let's collaborate.

Ad hominem is fine so long as it is accompanied with an argument, as opposed to being confused for an argument. In the latter case, deletion will follow.

Blogger Template by Clairvo