Skip to main content

Is the CIA using Wikileaks?

In conversation with an Indian bloke at the neighbourhood coffeeshop, by the name of Selvam , he updated me on Wiki Leaks on what singaporean Lee Kuan Yew (who has the credit of being the only ‘minister mentor’ - to chinese PMs in singapore - in the world), and Tommy Koh (ex-singaporean ambassador to the UN, or something like that or other) said about Indians, Malaysia, et cetera, et cetera.

Anyway, according to him, these leaks might have originated from the CIA themselves. Interesting. And certainly plausible, i thought. After all, world domination is what the NWO is after isn’t it. (New World Order - take a look at the latin inscription on the U.S. dollar bill, the Bilderburg group, the Rothschilds, the Council on Foreign Relations, Skull and Bones 322, Freemasons, etc, etc.) And as people are generally ‘educated’ into being quite adept at nothing other than being economic and reproductive drones, they certainly wouldn’t generally possess the perspectival intelligence to figure out how the world is actually run.

Well, according to him, these leaks were purposed to create animosity in the region. Possible. After all, too much stability in any region can lead to a concerted threat to a greater political entity. Imperialists thrive on mutual and common distrust, alienation, and fear, as that induces self-absorption and a narrowing of learning. make the rest of the world discount leaks on the U.S., the U.S. has to ensure that others face similar leaks themselves.
But upon further thought on Selvam’s astute suggestion that it was a CIA-initiated leak, I stated that another reason why they might have leaked this information, if they did, was to discredit Wikileaks as a whole. Why kill a bird with one stone when you can take down an entire aviary? The powers-that-be don’t become ‘the powers-that-be‘ by wasting resources. They didn’t get where they are by getting what they aim for, but getting more than they aimed for. They ensure that their planning produces, at most times, products and by-products that they can live off.

Initially, the U.S. had to face quite a bit of embarrassment over released leaks. That puts global scrutiny on the so-called ‘greatest nation on earth’. The best thing to do at times like these is to discredit the source by ensuring that U.S. misery is afforded company. To discount leaks on oneself, one has to discount leaks on another. So to make the rest of the world discount leaks on the U.S., the U.S. has to ensure that others face similar leaks themselves. Throw in a sexually-belligerent head of wikileaks being hauled up on charges of non-consensual consensual sex, and we have a nice little recipe to encourage everyone to go their merry way ignoring informational incontinence from any non-governmental source.

ed ain’t falling for that.




  2. Interesting article:


Post a Comment

The Inquisitive venture is a collaborative one. Let's collaborate.

Ad hominem is fine so long as it is accompanied with an argument, as opposed to being confused for an argument. In the latter case, deletion will follow.

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…