Skip to main content

UK: Liberal-Cons reject 'bitty' for free milk for under-5s

I thought that this piece of 'news' - that a suggestion by the UK health minister to her Scottish counterpart to scrap the free milk scheme for under-5s be cut - is nothing more than PR designed to compensate for whatever points lost by the slew of cuts that have come and are to come with the Liberal-Con union. 'Why is what's not happening headline news? Or is it simply an opportunity for the Lib-Con union to show the UK that they care and aren't the self-interested toffs that they are.

Anne Milton says,

"The programme did not "provide value for money in difficult times" and had "become increasingly outdated", said the minister." bbc

This could easily be paraphrased with, "The programme did not provide the elite with immediate value for money(extracted from the people in the first place) in times when our bank balances aren't bursting as many seams as it had in better times. And such top-down help is becoming increasingly outdated in a society increasingly groomed to be self-reliant after accepting their rightful place in the socioeconomic order of things." Perhaps Milton is a closet-confucian.

So milk-cuts for under-5s now and under-65s in the future. Desensitisation to that which is unjust is, after all, best effected incrementally isn't it.

And one has to wonder at the source of UK Health Minister, Anne Milton's inspiration. Perhaps one to many reruns of particular episodes of 'Little Britain'? Perhaps she's hoping that the impact of milk-cuts on the lower socio-economic classes could be compensated for by an extended period of breast-feeding?



Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…