Skip to main content

More on TR’s bias toward the fascist ‘Gatecrash Water Festival’ initiative

More on TR’s bias toward the fascist ‘Gatecrash Water Festival’ initiative

For all those whom might be inclined to believe that Temasek Review is unbiased and non-fascist on the basis of their publishing a2ed’s ‘Support (Bukit Batok) Water Festival’, well, one just has to look at the write-up and facebook screenshot that accompanied and served to support Aurora Long’s fascist ‘Gatecrash Water Festival’ initiative. I

The GWF initiative was also filed under ‘headlines’ whilst the SWF initiative was filed under ‘letters’ and no write-up or screenshot accompanied it. There is no reason why the SWF initiative could not have been filed under ‘headlines’ or accompanied by a supportive write-up and screenshot. It is in such differences that varying distinctions are accorded varying stances despite their being granted visibility. This is how agendas are set, and information variably presented for an intended effect, and by which public opinion is manipulated, along with the transmission of the perspective of the media source.

I’ll leave it to the reader to judge, on the basis of this evidence.



Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…