Skip to main content

in comment, Pink Dot 2010: Homo Sapiens or simply Homos?

'Freedom to love'?

A thousand turned up for the event in Hong Lim Park in 2009; 70 for the Abolish ISA event; and 40 for the 'Vui Kong we care' event'.

Even if all 70 in the second, and all 40 in the third were homosexuals, the question that begs to be asked is, where were the remaining 930 for the second, and 960 for the third.

That leads one to believe that's 'freedom to love' basically refers to the freedom to 'go down' on one's same sex neighbour. Wouldn't that be a mockery of love and the freedom to do so outside of the boundaries of self-interest? I'd opt for the freedom to love another despite my not being able to sweat it out with said other between the sheets.

Where one puts one's homosexuality above humanity, that is when one descends to being nothing but a good-for-nothing-else-homo. The same would apply to, for instance, heterosexuals who can think of nothing other than 'the next shag' with a member of the opposite sex - i know a few of those cretins myself. I have no problem with homosexuals or heterosexuals, but either would certainly deserve a derogatory 'goddamn homo' or 'goddamn hetero' if they do not extend their 'freedom to love' outside of the boudoir to others in need despite not being sexually attractive.

Given the obvious self-absorption by the homosexual community, as evidenced by the numbers mentioned above, all I can say is,

..make up your minds. Are you homo sapiens or just homos?


article/image source: Barnyard Chorus

Above statement placed as comment at aforementioned site


Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…