Skip to main content

The loss of a porker in the Chinese Zodiac - the difference between 'being sensitive' and 'being appreciative'

I don't know what the fuss is about. So you might not have an oinker amongst the overpriced dolls offered by MacDonald’s, but unlike the Malays, the Chinese have first digs at becoming a PM. This is simply a case of a 'figurehead' concession. Not surprisingly, some Chinese are fussing about the loss of a porker amongst some dollies but aren't as vociferously concerned about what the Malays are deprived of.

Instead of local bloggers banging on about ‘sensitivity' to Chinese sentiments’, I would suggest they consider some healthy mutual empathy and 'appreciation' instead.

There is quite the difference between 'being sensitive' and 'being appreciative' of difference and another's interests. The former is a double-edged sword that can keep others silent for the sake of sensitivity whilst the rest promote their interests over all others whilst ignoring the interests of others - that is how chinese culture was allowed to dominate the singaporean political, economic and cultural sphere to the detriment of all difference. 'Being appreciative', however, tempers the negative effects of sensitivity by prodding one to appreciate another's interest as much as one would one's own. It pairs sensitivity with equal respect and appreciation. Sensitivity, however, pairs silence and ignorance. We could say that 'being appreciative' is a check on the negative effects of 'being sensitive'.

Try to put yourself in others’ position, even if they might not be ‘majority what!’, and empathise with them as you do for those you’ve been taught to view as your perceived group. Try to speak up for egalitarianism as and when it is slighted by the many subtle and blatant means that at times seem to be 'uniquely singapore'.

Whilst you’re laughing along with others at the antics in ‘Serves you right’, ask yourself if there is anything amiss with the various portrayals alongs racial lines; whilst you’re celebrating your festivals, ask yourself if you’d like to have your celebrations confined to traditional enclaves whilst others are celebrated nationwide; ask yourself if you’d be happy about some government official stating that in 2 generations, the language of another ethnic group will be our mother tongue; ask yourself if you’d be thrilled to bits about policies that blatantly state that the country should always comprise mainly those of one ethnic group; and finally,

ask yourself if stamps and McDonald's toys are issued for all cultural celebrations; etc, etc, etc,

.....and after you’ve done all of that, ask yourself if kicking up a fuss over the loss of a porker is not inspired by your being used to having the advantage over all others. It's easy to 'be sensitive' mate, but it takes a leap beyond one's self-absorption to 'be appreciative'. If we were, we would have kicked up a fuss about the above way before a porker was extracted from the Zodiac by McDonalds. And if you didn't realise some or all of the above, and still call yourself a democrat, than you ought to be ashamed of yourself for these oversights as they point to your being more of a racist and fascist as opposed to a democrat. Remember, a racist is not only known by what he does or says, but what he fails to do or say.

Egalitarian multiculturalism. Let's see how we can bring it about shall we.




  1. well said Mr.Ed ! I just can't understand why all the fuss on some silly filthy pig on the expanse of the Malay Community.It reminds me ofthe silly fuss made over 'Allah' in Malaysia, that has escalated. I suppose the Chinese are trying to escalate this piggie issue too. It is really laughable that the future of a Chinese individual is related to animals. I have friends who are rat, pig,chicken and living in inferiority complex.Now the whole Malay community is in condemnation because of a lousy filthy pig. I hope the Chinese get their priorities right before it gets out of hand. -LIBRA



  3. Well, Libra and Capricorn, to be objective about it, what the both of you said about having one's future dependent on animals could be said of 'Libra' and 'Capricorn' too.

    I think a 'civilised' form of astrology would be Sociology-cum-Psychology. But then again, there might be some truth in some astrological systems. I'm not very versed in these things, so i'll remain silent on that.

    No. I don't think the Chinese would escalate this issue. They usually just carry on with life - given that they are in possession of an 'advantageous' and 'cool' language and have their sense of self-efficacy well nourished through the media, nationwide cultural celebrations, etc, from childhood. Perhaps it's that that has caused some furore amongst some bloggers as they are not used to taking second place in anything;)

    Hence, this brief article.

  4. I agree with your rational thoughts,Ed!


Post a Comment

The Inquisitive venture is a collaborative one. Let's collaborate.

Ad hominem is fine so long as it is accompanied with an argument, as opposed to being confused for an argument. In the latter case, deletion will follow.

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…