Skip to main content

Why I’m not ‘proud to be Indian’ & dislike the word ‘diaspora’.

It reduces our potential to be despite a singular historical experience, or more than one historical experience.

It imposes upon us a lineage that oftentimes serves as a Great Wall wherein we seek exclusionary refuge that at the same time becomes a phalanx in our march against difference-cum-self glorification. It is intellectually improprietous to claim a historical heritage when we did not mortar a single brick in the construction of our respective Taj Mahals. We become hangers-on in the cultural achievements of others whose only real link to us in their not being able to avail themselves of contraceptives. It detracts our attention from us being potentially more than the present which is oftentimes a replication of the past that is never of our making. It diminishes our appreciation of respect by confining it within the traditional for tradition’s sake.

When I was 18, a friend said to me, ‘you must be proud to be Indian’. I said, ‘why should I be proud to be Indian when I played no part in the achievements of the Indians? If I am, in part, ‘Indian’, by my unwitting socialisation into their worldview, then there is no pride to be taken in it as it could very well mean my being a subconscious victim of it – unless I can prove to be right and true all that I’ve been taught whilst in the stupor of an impressionable childhood. And even if it can be proven to be right and true, how can I take pride in that which required no effort at all on my part to learn? And if I achieve anything due to inherited perspectives passed on to me via conduits below my threshold of awareness or via habituation, then it is to the source and purveyors of these that goes the credit, not to myself.

So keep your diaspora to yourselves. I can be the conduit of any strain of thought of my conscious and conscientious choosing. And only then can I claim any credit. Even then, I cannot take pride in that which I am or that which I know if I cannot prove that I’ve yet to access all known and knowable perspectives from all cultures that can increase the worth of my perspectival arsenal. Till then, I’m only a shadow of all that I can be, and if I take pride in this, then I’m condemned to live in the fragment of a shadow of the self I’ve yet to be.

So if you say that I’m of the ‘Indian diaspora’, the only thing I can say to that is that it isn’t my fault, and that I’ll still try to be more despite its being of a singular perspectival origin.




  1. That's a very honest and learned opinion you have made of yourself, Ed!
    I would consider myself an ethnic being and citizen of Mother Earth. Regardless of my race,colour and creed. Respect for others as long as they don't impose their thoughts on me.


Post a Comment

The Inquisitive venture is a collaborative one. Let's collaborate.

Ad hominem is fine so long as it is accompanied with an argument, as opposed to being confused for an argument. In the latter case, deletion will follow.

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…