Skip to main content

Should the Queen's Speech be cancelled, or perhaps just the Monarchy

"Should the Queen’s Speech be cancelled?

Nick Clegg has called for the Queen’s Speech to be cancelled and replaced with emergency reforms. Would this clean up British politics?" [bbc]

a2ed's comment at BBC's site goes :

Looking at quite a lot of the comments here, i have to wonder whether the people here know what 'democracy' is all about. I don't see why the UK should have a 'Queen' and encourage insensible worship of celebrities. If people are so objective, as ought to be a requirement for any citizen, then why the worship of some woman when others like her have to huddle together to contend with increasing gas bills this winter.

Perhaps it might help wean the people off celeb-worship. Some say the ‘Queen’ is all that is 'great about this country' - and many of these people probably include those who went into an epileptic fit at the news of MJ's death. I’m thinking along the lines of a statue of say, a towering Buddha in gold, the worshipping masses living in relative poverty around it, whilst taking comfort in a golden Buddha watching benevolently over them whilst giving people afar the impression that the city has arrived at the Golden Age. Such nonsense. Imagine everyone in the UK contributing a quid to a common pool so that the people as a whole can think they are rich because of the accumulated millions – before going on to complain about the rising costs of housing, gas bills, etc. So long as we keep the ‘celeb industry’ going, we are going to be compromising that degree of objectivity amongst the masses required to keep lots of other subjectivity-induced troubles alive. You don't have to be a 'leftie' to think along these lines. You just have to give tyrannous reign to objectivity an what seems to be an uncommon common sense to do so.

The question ought to be, not if the Queen’s speech ought to be canceled, but if the Monarchy ought to be relegated to the dustbin of history. People complain about the divisive mentality of the BNP, but jostle against each other on Remembrance Day to catch a glimpse of one of the quintessential symbols of class/national division. How is it possible to bemoan the losses in WWI and II whilst celebrating one of the significant causes of it at the same time?

The generic strength of division, in the form of the national and class systems, is that which contributes significantly to the mind being rendered more amenable to other forms of division to counter the consequences of the former two.

Too bad the Indians kicked the British out of the Empire, if not, the British might have learnt a thing or two from them and pensioned off the 'Queen'.




Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…