Skip to main content

Queen's 'Speech' or 'lip synch'?

‘What do you think of the Queen’s Speech’, went BBC’s question.

Frankly, I feel that question is quite the insult to one’s intelligence. That’s akin to asking a child what s/he thought of Kermit the Frog’s advice to eat her/is asparagus after a parent had used the former as a sock-puppet to push for the latter.

But that goes on all the time doesn’t it. There are ‘stars’ representing humanity in the UN, Joinred’s attempt to boost profits for corporations for a worthy cause, etc, whilst the true professional humanitarians are cast aside in favour of sock puppets for a juvenile mass of ‘fans’. So is the ‘Queen’s Speech’ any different.

‘Queen’s lip synch’ sounds more apt. One thing you can be sure about, a people who need to be lip synched to, or do not deem anything amiss in it, also indicates the degree to which their own appreciation of reason in itself is compromised. Wonder how much of global problems that are, and is yet to be, are being exacerbated, or allowed to proceed without common cognizance, because of that.

This, amongst other significant instances, are one of the ways that people are taught not to appreciate reason in itself unless it is accompanied by fanfare and fairy lights. That just goes toward undermining the people's belief in their own significance, and which leads to them discounting significant produce emerging from themselves since they are not similarly lauded.

Personally, I’d prefer ole Kermit to the Queen to deliver the lip-synch. All you need to maintain the former is a lint-remover.




Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…