Skip to main content

On the case of the London Jewish Free School

[As a2ed is currently ‘moderated’ on The Guardian since taking issue with Michelle Goldberg’s Zionist/fascist views. Comments posted in The Guardian, most of which aren’t approved anymore, will be published here.]

Said, Simon Jenkins, with regards to the issue of barring a child from a school on ethnic grounds, says,

In the case currently before the court, a 13-year-old applicant to the JFS had an Orthodox Jewish father and worshipped at an Orthodox synagogue. His mother thought she was Jewish, but only by conversion at a non-Orthodox ceremony. This made the son not Jewish enough for a school place, in the eyes of the JFS.(source)


Yes, I do agree with Simon in that ethnicity ought never to be an issue.

If ethnicity is linked to faith or culture, it is not because it is divinely ordained that it be so, but because relatively insulated histories caused such an association. Just as said insulated histories caused such associations, a multicultural milieu, such as the UK, ought to be allowed to influence the continued evolution and redefinition of ethnicity and culture just as its prior milieu had done.


ed

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…