Skip to main content

Obama's Nobel Prize : Obama the Han?

So Barack Obama has been awarded the nobel peace prize for ‘his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples"

My first thought - that’s like awarding the Han Dynasty the said prize for toning down the harsh methods utilised by the preceding ‘book-burning and scholar burying’ Qin Dynasty so that it could continue with, and perpetuate, the overarching fascist perspectives of the former via relative ‘benevolence’.

What is lost at one time serves as the foundations upon which we will make sense of gain with the persona we are left with in the following era. The question I’m forced to ask is, what have we been reduced to via the perspectival losses incurred in the ongoing American century that leads us to view as 'gain enough' to award an American president a nobel peace prize?

Would Marie Antoinette be awarded a nobel peace prize for improving diplomacy and cooperation between the aristos and peasants? Ought Obama to be given an award for undoing a modicum of the mess American administrations have created over decades, or sweeping up the debris post-reconstruction in the American elite's favour? Isn't this yet another Han-like effort to put on a benevolent face after the achievements of the past have been delivered via harsh methods that disqualified past administrations from the nobel peace prize? Giving Obama the said prize serves to whitewash the overarching system wherein humanity is interned. This, to myself, sounds like yet another modernist move to justify the system via accolades to those whom attempt to renovate the existing superstructure to serve as a buffer against the efforts of those whom attempt to question it from the cornerstone up.

These and other thoughts and questions race through my mind, and I’m inclined to dismiss the value of the nobel peace prize award just as those whom returned their knighthoods when the Beatles went on bended knee before the queen, or when the fascist state of China was allowed to host the Olympics.




Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…