Skip to main content

Michael Jackson's, 'This is it' - This is Shite

"It was fitting that this could not be an ordinary premiere. At 1am, a specially invited UK audience became one of the first in the world to watch a film showing Michael Jackson's final weeks." Mark Brown, The Guardian.

Fitting? Yes indeed. A fitting vindication of the notion that humanity is fast devolving with the aid of, amongst others, the mutation of the netherregions of 'celebs' into a alters of worship.

What can we make of the timing for Michael Jackson’s posthumous global premiere of, ‘This is it’?

In the final analyses, it simply serves to further deify this bloke and what he represents as people are united throughout the globe at the same time, despite sleep-time, to honour the memory of crotch-swivelling and hoo ha-ing – a contemporary version2 upgrade of Edgar Rice Burrough’s ‘Tarzan’ – whilst further validating the significance of living vicariously through ‘celebs’.

Think about it. Even the ‘millennium’ wasn’t observed in such a fashion as people across the world woke up to the ‘new’ ‘millennium’ – which actually arrived in the year 2001 – in respect of their localised body-clocks as opposed to the local time in the Republic of Kiribati – which is supposed to be the first human-inhabited locale on the planet to see the ‘new millennium’ according to the Julian calendar….though I think that the fisherpersons plying their trade off its coast might have a first claim on that.

But in the case of Michael, people stayed up to pay simultaneous homage to what intelligent minds of previous epochs would discount as one requiring sectioning – just as everyone whom were accustomed to putting the day before the month started doing the inverse with the Americanised, ‘9/11’.

It doesn’t matter if most didn’t stay up for this event, what is of significance here is that most didn’t deem anything amiss along the lines discussed here. In that, our sense of the significance of time is monopolised by the two complementary and symbiotic stages of ‘work’ and ‘vicarious existence’. But when is global unity expressed on such a timescale as that witnessed with this show of misdirected juvenile vibrancy? – its ‘misdirected’ not because such vibrancy is a ‘bad thing’ in itself, but because it is not expressed in equal scale when it comes to intellectual and humanitarian proclivities. Were simultaneous protests launched throughout the world when America launched its onslaught on Iraq? Did simultaneous protests meet, U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Madeline Allbright’s statement, that the deaths of close to half a million children in Iraq arising out of U.S. sponsored embargoes were ‘worth the price’? There seems to be two definitions of the word, ‘simultaneous’, here, and which might indicate that the global popular mindset is out of sync when it comes to issues that matter as opposed to celeb matter, posthumous or otherwise. Humanity isn't going to really be able to appreciate the generic idea of Equity and Empathy till it ceases to undermine the basis for its appreciation at every opportunity - such as this instance.

I suppose that is why I’ve yet to take the vows of atheism as humanity has argued little for its perspectives being the source of progress. I’d rather have Saints whom serve as a sharp contrast to sinners whilst coming across as achievable examples than ‘Celebs’ who thrive by maintaining the divide whilst turning sin into virtue.




Popular posts from this blog

Is singapore a tyranny, or are people to dumbed down to feel it?

The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.

Manifesto Against Same-Sex Marriages and Homo-Promotion

My stand against homosexuality is based on the following.  It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.

Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages.  All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.

This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned.  Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.

‘Nothing is natural.  Everything is just a matter of preference.’  That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation.  In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence.  No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…