The following is a consideration of the perspective posted at the site, 'article14'. The site, in discussing the so-called 'Black Sunday movement' whose members wear black and congregate at Starbucks - perhaps they have an unstated desire to boost Starbucks sales of overpriced beverages, or perhaps Starbucks is paying for their black garments...silly people - to express their support for the freedom of expression - brought up certain points that seem to be commonly held by the 'singaporeans' of today.
My stand against homosexuality is based on the following. It is a logical, rather than a personal, decision.
Under the slogan, 'the freedom to love', it in principle justifies incestuous, group, etc, marriages. All it requires is 'consenting adults', without an inquiry into what it means to be an 'adult' in intelligent, moral, and introspective terms.
This in turn encourages a ‘go with your feel’ tendency, which in itself gives rise a myriad of tendencies that go unquestioned. Right and wrong ceases to matter, and even if something is illegal, one can still view it as society just having its own bias against it, just as it once had a ‘bias’ against homosexuality.
‘Nothing is natural. Everything is just a matter of preference.’ That is the basic thrust of this unfortunate situation. In fact, having a preference is in itself seen as evidence of one’s intelligence. No attention needs to be paid to intellectuals, thinkers, philosophers, sages, religious te…