'Night Flight reprise', from the self-produced album, Blue Jazz.
edsBackalleyBand on Youtube
composed, produced, by, ed

Homopromo and the problem with westerners





It is quite the rage in the west, and via the west, the world, to confuse the protection of  the right to engage in something with the normalcy of the activity itself.

Right.  So we have some idiots beating up homosexuals, or homosexuals being discriminated against in employment, or in the army, amongst others.  So westerners get together and call for an end to such persecution and discrimination.  And rightly so. 

 

But they have confused the right to not be harassed and discriminated, and the right to do what you want so long as it doesn’t affect the interests of others, with the promotion of that which is discriminated against. 

It is quite a dilemma, I have to admit.  How do we fight against discrimination against homosexuals without presenting homosexuality as normal?  Or putting it another way, why should we fight against discrimination against homosexuality by presenting homosexuality as normal?  It’s as if, if something is abnormal, it is alright to discriminate against it, and hence, to deter discrimination against it, we have to promote it as normal.



In such a situation, we have to remember that we should be simply focusing on the right to not be discriminated against, or persecuted, or beaten up, for our tendencies.  That’s it.  We shouldn’t be saying, ‘hey, you can’t beat that homosexual up because it is normal to be homosexual.’  Rather, we should be saying, ‘hey you can’t beat that homosexual up whether what s/he does is normal or not.’ 

If we take that former stance, we’ll just end up promoting homosexuality, as is already the case via western movies, sit-coms, etc.


why should we fight against discrimination against homosexuality by presenting homosexuality as normal?


Of course, with that, we come into another problem.  Defining what is ‘normal’.  Westerners will have you believe that if someone likes something, it is normal, so long as it doesn’t affect the interests of others, or harm others.  Don’t forget, the west has no moral compass.  They are largely and pretty much a Godless hedonistic race whose children are led by advertisements, the corporation, and are pretty much ignorant about perspectives from all other cultures across the world because the colonial era, to the present, has been nothing but an effort to enrich themselves and nothing about learning anything from others that does not lead to profit in their pockets. 

Hence, when they pass an opinion on anything, they are passing it not on the basis of all that is to be known, but all that they know after ignoring any perspective of non-western origin.  For them, ‘evil’ is just something they don’t like, not something that is a concept that can be used to check on their own tendencies.  Likewise, the idea of ‘good’, for such a people, becomes nothing but that which has a large amount of ‘like’ on Facebook.  The idea of Good is not something that is understood ONLY after they have engaged in critical introspection and considered the perspectives of non-western origins.  You could say that next to China, the west, with America leading the way, view themselves as the centre of civilisation.  Now I have no problem with that if they serve as a clearing house for the ideas of the whole world.  Unfortunately, they only serve as a pulpit upon which they proselytise to the whole world that which they know after ignoring all that is to be known from the rest of the world other than the negative stuff.


We shouldn’t be promoting every fetish out there simply because there is someone out there to discriminate against someone engaging in the fetish. 


Hence, for such a people, the western individual’s tendencies and ‘likes’ are the source of all that should be done or paid attention to.  Whether it is the childish way they speak English - as evident in their sit-coms and movies of recent years; their computer games which are either generally grossly childish and mind-numbingly repetitive or full of gore and violence; their movies which are basically almost all children’s movies but which may be classified as ‘adult’ not because of intelligent content, but because of violence/sex/nudity/gore/vulgarity; or their paying actors, tv presenters, and sportspersons billions whilst stating that they do not have enough funds to get a cure for cancer, HIV, and Alzheimer's; or promoting fast foods laden with fat and sugar that will leave their pharmaceutical companies laughing their way to the bank; or calling for a 'war on terror' against others after these others had retaliated for far worse done by the americans against them; or promoting the asinine activities and interests of their teenagers via youtube vids now being increasingly aired on television; or coming with one reality show or fake reality show or movies or sit-coms that are grossly sexist against men, downright mean and sarcastic and malicious; or having women play the role of downright bitches in the movies and sit-coms that just blurs the lines between men and women to the point that one can arguably view a heterosexual marriage as a homosexual one.  



That is the western definition of ‘adult’?  



How much credence should any objective aspiring adult be giving the pronouncements of normalcy by such an ‘adult’? 



So when they go on their streets and protest for the right of women to be sluts, or for ‘gays’ to take pride, and then move on to tell the whole world that what the white man and women decide amongst themselves to be normal is so, simply because they like it.  And if you disagree, you are a ‘homophobe’.  No mate, if I don’t think it normal is because it simply isn’t.  You want to engage in it, go right ahead.  I may even join you out of curiosity or for a 'change of scenery'.  But I’m not going to start taking ‘pride‘ in it and demanding that such activities are aired on television and cast as alright.  We shouldn’t be promoting every fetish out there simply because there is someone out there to discriminate against someone engaging in the fetish. 

Humanity wouldn’t be here if our first ancestors simply stuck to shagging their own gender.  Progress isn’t coming to a point where we are finally technologically advanced enough to have abortion, surrogacy and homosexuality and not risk our human race being wiped out.  We may keep humanity alive, but what spiritual qualities are we losing.  Oh, sorry, I forgot, the white man’s idea of ‘spirit’ is that which is contained within a bottle right? 

I'm not saying that we should spurn everything western.  Certainly not.  If they choose to come to conclusions and attribute value to anything on the basis of the little that they know, we should not make the same mistake by ignoring all that is western and coming to conclusions and attributing value to anything on the basis of the little that we know.  I personally attempt to engage in a 'cancelling out' process where take the positives of one culture and use it to detect the evils in another culture and vice versa.  To that, i need to appreciate all the cultural perspectives out there, including western as well - and i have certainly learnt significant things from them as well.  It is only through this process that we can begin to know what is right, instead of confusing 'white as right' as western whites do.


Technological advance has to be paired with perspectival cosmopolitanism.  In other words, until you have descended from your high horse and considered the views of people of pigment, what you have to say should be taken with more than a smidgin of scepticism as the pronouncements of someone who claims to know it all after ignoring everything that is to be known of non-western origins.



 ed





Beware the Oxford Dictionary






Does the commonwealth games whitewash British colonial atrocities and maintain white supremacy?




The Queen will formally open the 20th Commonwealth Games in Glasgow later, in front of a 40,000 crowd at Celtic Park.
Organisers said a global TV audience of up to a billion people was expected to watch the event from 21:00 BST.
More than 4,500 athletes from 71 Commonwealth nations and territories will parade during the curtain-raiser. - bbc

I don’t know how the formerly oppressed and exploited nations under the colonial auspices of the UK can take part in such a self-abnegating event.  

They were, after all, colonised, exploited terribly, and millions of them died in ‘service’ of the British Queen and country.  Picture China having a ‘commonwealth’ games in a few decades time and the Tibetans sending a team to take part in it whilst the event is overseen by the CCP.  Does that not justify all that had happened to them?  Is that not a subconscious or conscious kow-tow to the CCP?  Or perhaps the Jews occupying Palestine could in the future, after they had successfully shuffled off and talked the Palestinians into accepting their places, hold similar games and have the Palestinians take part to celebrate peace and harmony? 


Same goes in the case of the Commonwealth.  It is an insult to the ancestors of all the non-European member states of the 'commonwealth' who were forced to grow cash crops for the British and die by the millions as a result; it is an insult to all the aboriginals of states like New Zealand, Australia, and Tasmania who were slaughtered because they were deemed to be inferior by the British, the Africans whom were enslaved by the millions, the Chinese, the Indians......   


And what is so ‘common’ about the ‘wealth’?  Britain ripped off trillions from all those states it economically and racistly colonised, took it and built their amenities and corporations that dominate the globe, and then formed a union with ‘whites only’ via the European Union and basically told those they exploited to bugger off.



And what is so ‘common’ about the ‘wealth’?  Britain ripped off trillions from all those states it economically and racistly colonised, took it and built their amenities and corporations that dominate the globe, and then formed a union with ‘whites only’ via the European Union and basically told those they exploited to bugger off.  So what’s so ‘common’ about the ‘wealth’?  



For the British Queen to preside over this disgraceful event is to basically state that no remorse on the part of the British Monarchy or Country is necessary for their genocidal and grossly exploitative activities throughout the world that basically makes Hitler just a little evil in comparison.  This is no different from, if Hitler had won the war and held a Nazi commonwealth games a couple of decades later with all nations that had been under its thumb in attendance.  



It is nothing but a tribute to the Nazi colonial overlords and their racist exploitation of your people in the past.  By not doing so, you have successfully turned the graves of your ancestors into a playground for the entertainment of those who killed them.



All non-white nations taking part in these games, remember, this is not an event that brings humanity together in ‘fun and games’ but has, as its foundation, a view that the west were right in all that they did to you, and that their civilisation of gross mutual exploitation is alright, and that it is alright for their Queen to preside over the descendants of those ‘coolies’ who had enabled her to buy her shoes and diamonds with their forced labour.  It is basically a practice in global non-white self-disrespect, and respect for continuing western white supremacy.  They basically exploited and killed your ancestors, and now throw some games at you for you to play under the gaze of their overpriviliged Queen.



It is nothing but a tribute to the Nazi colonial overlords and their racist exploitation of your people in the past.  By not doing so, you have successfully turned the graves of your ancestors into a playground for the entertainment of those who killed them.
 

Nothing less that a single-fingered salute should be accorded the British Nazi Queen and country, and these shameful games for their gross self-satisfied arrogance.  If not, we'll just be pandering to further Eurocentrism which will not only lead to their ascendancy at great cost to others, but will not encourage us ability to 2nd guess their narrow vision of what humanity ought to be with our own cultural gems that might alleviate many an evil they take as natural.


postscript, i posted something similar to the first paragraph on the BBC website in the comments section beneath the aforelinked article.  I subsequently received the following email from the BBC,

"
Dear BBC Visitor,
 
Thank you for contributing to the BBC web site. 
Unfortunately we've had to remove the content below because it 
contravened one of our House Rules.
 
Your comment was considered to have broken 
the following House Rule:
 
"We reserve the right to fail comments which...
 
Are considered likely to disrupt, provoke, attack or 
offend others
 
Are racist, sexist, homophobic, sexually explicit, abusive 
or otherwise objectionable
 
Contain swear words or other language likely to offend""
 
 
Looks like the BBC are keen to maintain the illusion of unity through the 'Commonwealth' Games and dispel any notion that it may be an effort to whitewash British gross exploitation of the member states and how it maintains western political and cultural hegemony of the non-western world. 

Truth always offends those whom want to perpetuate an untruth.



ed




D-Day, In discussion: When Nazis clashed with each other



French President Francois Hollande has led the D-Day 70th anniversary tributes by remembering those who died on a day that "changed the world".


He attended a service near Bayeux with US President Barack Obama, who said the US commitment to liberty was "written in blood" on French beaches. The Queen laid a wreath at a ceremony nearby.
They will gather at Sword Beach, one of five landing points for Allied troops.

The landings were the first stage of the invasion of Nazi-occupied Europe. - bbc


Discussion on BBC Facebook


Ed: Ww2 was just infighting amongst western racists and fascists with megalomaniacal ambitions.


George C. Brunner: Edwin: you should be thanking those who died so you can spout your nonsense.


Ed: No thank you mate. The indians already had freedom of speech long before Christ was born. Don't you know about your own neo-Nazi history?  I could already spout 'my nonsense' long before the pillaging white men reached the shores of India.


Martyn Van der Voort
: So you were even spouting before Alexander The Great over 300 years BC. Are you a timelord? Or just a student with no clue?

Ed: I'm talking about the Indian people Martyn. Too thick too understand i see, especially if you feel the need to refer to Dr Who.


Adrian Theobald: You hate the white man yet you happily live in our country don't you? Hypocrite.


Ed: Your country? You're joking right. Your country was built on the blood, sweat, and tears of millions of Indians, Chinese, Africans, etc.

You can go about all pretentious and holier-than-thou simply because you outsourced suffering and much labour to others in chains.

Have some remorse and shame will you. Or at least, start with a proper education. There is more to be known than can be found at the bottom of a pint or pudding you know.

Anyway, i don't hate the white man. I'm just pointing out self-serving deficiencies in their worldvision that has untoward consequences to the present.


Elizabeth Chapman: Please this is a day to remember all the men who died whatever nationality and many men came from Commonwealth and beyond. This is a day to remember and not to argue who built and who did this. This a page to remember. Thank you.


Ed: I'm remembering alright Elizabeth.

I'm remembering how Indians were being treated as 2nd class citizens in India whilst those you are remembering were maintaining such conditions.

I'm remembering the natives of america who were being treated as such in the US.

I'm remembering that the blacks there were being treated as such as well and were segregated and called 'niggers'.

I'm remembering how children were kidnapped from their aboriginal parents in Australia so that they could 'be reared white' by those you are remembering.

I'm remembering how the americans bombed Tokyo Bay 100 years before Pearl Harbour to force them to open up to western exploitation....and which in turn forced Japan to fashion themselves along western lines in order to defend against them....and which in turn led to become a megalomanical force themselves.

So all this, 'heroism' of the west against racism and fascism is a whole load of Marvel-style west-as-the-superhero crap. Both world wars were started by the west, and the rest of the world were dragged into it as fodder for their canons.  In their fight against the Nazis, they were fighting against an evil that was a more blatant manifestation of themselves.  In other words, they were clearing up part of an evil which they themselves had given birth to.  In effect, they were all Nazis flying different banners and having different approaches in appreciation of a common ethos.

So Elizabeth, i'm remembering it alright. I'm remembering it as it ought to be remembered, whilst you're choosing to remember it on the basis of what you're self-servingly choosing to forget.

Thank you.



ed




Prince Charles says Russians are Nazi-like? And the British are different?





A former Polish war refugee who met Prince Charles in Canada has said he likened some Nazi actions in Europe to those of Russia's Vladimir Putin.
Marienne Ferguson was speaking after meeting Prince Charles at a Nova Scotia immigration museum where she works.
As they discussed Hitler's takeover of countries, the prince "said something to the effect of 'it's not unlike... what Putin is doing,'" she recalled.
- bbc

In a nutshell, Its kind of funny to see the British talking about Nazis considering the fact that they were pronounced Nazis themselves for more than a hundred years in their view and dealings with the lands they colonised.  They actually viewed peoples of other lands as inferior for a number of reasons from their not practicing capitalism, exploiting the land, being nude or semi-nude, being communal, or not having vast cities.  And that served as one of significant bases upon which they determined how the various colonised ought to be treated.  



So in some climes, they were just killed; in others, the children were kidnapped and brought up ‘to be white’; in others they were enslaved, and in others, they were made 2nd Class citizens of their own states.  Millions and millions, as a result, died for the British Nazi ‘Queen/King and country’. 


The worst part of this tale is that the British still think similarly.  The strongest evidence for which is their thinking nothing of the hundreds of thousands of deaths they, the west, had inflicted on, for instance, the people in the Middle East through embargoes, support of tyrannical regimes, supplying arms to murderous leaders, etc, but were quick to get angry when the americans suffered a few thousand deaths as retaliation on 11/9.  I personally was flabbergasted when i saw a BBC reporter state on the televised news that, "It wasn't half a million Iraqi children whom died due to US embargoes, but JUST 350,000."  'Just'?  Well, that's white supremacism for you. 

All in all, the only difference between the British and the Nazis was that the British were economically pragmatic in their racism.  The British were more ‘humane’.  They let millions work themselves to death whilst enriching their Queen/King and country unlike the Nazis whom simply killed you.  How nice and civilised, the British.

That clearly indicates that they view ‘white lives‘ as more valuable than non-white.  During colonial times, people who retaliated were called ‘savages’ because they dared to resist people whom saw themselves as 'civilised'.  Now they are called ‘terrorists’ for shooting back when they only have a right to be shot at the behest of the white man.  With these words - 'savages', 'terrorist' - no analysis was required as they present them simply as ‘bad‘ or ‘evil‘ people with no need to search for causes.  Hence, the western ‘we are the Chosen People‘ mentality, with a greater right to life still continues, as i discovered post 11/9.  Up to then, i thought the west had learnt their lesson and become egalitarian.  But 11/9 served as incontrovertible proof that the colonial white supremacist view was alive and kicking in the west.




All in all, the only difference between the British and the Nazis was that the British were economically pragmatic in their racism. They view you as inferior, so they exploit you even if it costs millions of the lives of the colonised. When the German Nazis saw you as inferior, they simply killed you.  So the only difference here was that the Nazis didn’t make much money out of the people they killed.  The British were more ‘humane’.  They let millions work themselves to death whilst enriching their Queen/King and country unlike the Nazis whom simply killed you.  How nice and civilised.
 

If you think about it, all those iconic British industries, their NHS, their roads, their underground, amongst a host of others were funded by the colonised.  And if that isn't bad enough, they now close off their borders to non-whites with the formation of the EU.  And none of them realise the racist significance of this.  One Brit told me, when i spoke about it, that it wasn't intentional.  My response was, "Yes, it isn't intentional, but it is nevertheless a consquence of the preponderance of the racist and nazi colonial mentality amongst you people in the present that stops you from realising it in the first place."

I've spoken to quite a few Brits about this, and their reaction ranged from, 'well, all those millions of deaths amongst the colonised resulting from British action wasn't intentional', to, 'Well, it was a long time ago."  To which i had responded, "you can't say that it isn't intentional if you are well aware of the consequences.  Causing the deaths of millions whilst profitting from their lives shows an equally clear disregard for life as the German Nazis who killed people despite not gaining profit."  And to those who had said that 'it was a long time ago, i responded with, "well then, why not wait for a year after 11/9 before you retaliate?  Then you can say that 11/9 was a long while back so you needn't bother?"  Well, the British are quite reasonable enough to usually shut up after that.


You could say that without the British and other western colonial powers, Hitler wouldn't have thought the way he did.   In fact, the Nazis did the British a favour.  By being more obvious about their disregard for life than the British, they enabled the British, and the rest of the western underworld, to claim that they themselves were saints because they fought against them.  So as for Charlie, which peasants refer to as ‘Prince’, comparing the Russians to the Nazis, i think it would be quite appropriate to retort it in an american way, 'go blow it out of your ass'.



ed





Boko Haram give 'Terrorism' a bad name



Africa leaders declare 'war' on Nigeria Boko Haram

African leaders meeting in Paris have agreed to wage "war" on Nigeria's Boko Haram Islamic militants.

President Hollande of France, who hosted the summit, said regional powers had pledged to share intelligence and co-ordinate action against the group.

Last month it abducted 223 schoolgirls in north-eastern Nigeria, where it is based. Fresh attacks were reported in Nigeria and Cameroon overnight.

Boko Haram give 'terrorism' a bad name.

Terrorism, at the end of the day, is non-state-sanctioned violence by a non-state-supported militia for political/social/economic ends.   The evil here, according to the west and fans of Iron Man and Captain America, is not the violence, but that it is being committed without the express approval of the state.

'Terrorism' is a term frequently used by those in power to vilify those who refuse the state the monopoly on violence for political/social/economic ends, or, who dare to retaliate for what was done unto those they identify with.  It was, in that same vein, that the west called those who retaliated ‘savages’ in colonial times when they went throughout the globe exploiting and killing millions.

It is only when we appreciate these logical points that we can put an end to terrorism, state-sanctioned or otherwise because we need to look at causes and effects instead of just throwing in our support for the west simply because, according to the gullible, they produce ‘good’ movies.

As for Boko-Haram, they are just psychopaths who treat children’s lives so callously.  Though, they are not too different from the americans who sanctioned the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children in Iraq via medical embargoes in the decade prior to 11/9, or who killed women and children in the undemocratic state of Nippon with two atoms bombs. But the americans aren't 'terrorists' because they are part of the UN right?  But western or white supremacists would disagree I suppose.

Very few think these days.







edsbackalleyband - 'The Gloom'



music composed by, ed








The Indian Cure for Cancer




The problem with western medicine is much like the western mindset - set in western ways.  These people spent a few hundred years robbing countries across the world off their wealth for capitalist, and to some extent, popular gain, and at the same time placed their corporation at the helm of development in all respects.  The problem with that is that they are led by big corporations who find cures on the basis of what is most profitable, or footdrag their way through the search for cures so that profits from existing 'treatments' can be squeezed out for longer.

So, whilst we need western medicine, we also need to complement it with non-western alternatives to make the former more effective, or perhaps to do without it altogether.

all this so-called 'research' into cancer, cures for HIV, etc, etc, are funded by, or used to subsidise, big pharmaceutical companies who don't want cures for anything unless it translates to huge bucks. 


Don't forget, all these so-called 'research' into cancer, cures for HIV, etc, etc, are funded by, or used to subsidise, big pharmaceutical companies who don't want cures for anything unless it translates to huge bucks.  And as westerners are generally ignorant and tend to ignore, or demonise, anything of non-western origins, all their charities also tend to ignore non-western alternatives. 


That is when people like us have to step in to teach these poor white folk some commonsense.  I say 'commonsense' because commonsense, logically, is a function, or product, of knowing what is the right thing to do AFTER we have considered ALL available alternatives.  In that sense, the average westerner, who is pretty much ignorant about all other ways, isn't going to have much commonsense - quite like the chinese and americans as well.  And if we keep just following their lead, we are going to discard our culturally and historically induced knowledge and be left only with that which catches the white man's eye.  The pool of human imaginative, creative, and intellectual knowledge is greatly reduced because of it.  Music, the arts, intellectual perspectives, etc, etc, etc, will all be severely compromised and degenerate as it already is in the process of.

Getting back on topic, it has been found that countries where people consume about 200mg of turmeric a day have lower incidence of quite a few types of cancers including lung cancer (1 teaspoon of turmeric is equals to 5000mg.  India is a case in point.  There was one case of a Vicky Stewart of Britain who used turmeric to cure herself of stage 4 cancer.  But you don't hear about much research being done about it in the UK after that.  Why?  Well, i've explained that already above.

Instead of talking about having your traditional '5-a-day' which includes fruits and veg, perhaps they should consider how a simple teaspoon of turmeric might count as an additional 5-a-day all by itself.

But they aren't focusing on that because their idea of '5-a-day' is limited to what they are accustomed to eating instead of what is available to eat even it it isn't their custom to do so.


I'm not saying that eating Indian food, or turmeric is going to guarantee that one doesn't get cancer.  What i'm saying is that the overall proportion of people getting it is going to reduce.  Given that Britain has a cancer epidemic where 1 in 3 people get it, they should get their heads out of their sunday roast ovens and into some good Indian cookery books.  

Instead of talking about having your traditional '5-a-day' which includes fruits and veg, perhaps they should consider how a simple teaspoon of turmeric might count as an additional 5-a-day all by itself.  But they aren't focusing on that because their idea of '5-a-day' is limited to what they are accustomed to eating instead of what is available to eat even it it isn't their custom to do so. 

Anyway, when it comes to food, i prefer Indian food (I also like African food as well), with its rich spices and flavours - minus the negative stuff that indians tend to put in like too much salt and fatty oils like 'Ghee'.   If western food, amongst others, is 'as good as sex', then Indian food is like a prolonged orgasm.  You can quote the ed meister on that.

When i eat western or chinese food, it keeps me alive.  But when it comes to Indian food, as the sweat rolls down my shaven head, i FEEL alive. Well, it looks like Indian food might also increase your chances of being alive as well.  That said, i do borrow ideas from Chinese and Western cuisine as well, like spring onions, black pepper, herbs, amongst others.



ed






Blogger Template by Clairvo